edoc-vmtest

Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling compliance in Pregnant Women : A Randomized Controlled Study

Moeller, J. and Lieb, R. and Meyer, A. H. and Quack Lötscher, K. and Krastel, B. and Meinlschmidt, G.. (2014) Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling compliance in Pregnant Women : A Randomized Controlled Study. PLoS One, 9 (1). e86204.

[img] PDF - Published Version
Available under License CC BY (Attribution).

149Kb

Official URL: http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6205400

Downloads: Statistics Overview

Abstract

Objective: Noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and has been associated with biased cortisol estimates in nonpregnant subjects. This study is the first to investigate in pregnant women strategies to improve ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance, and the association between sampling noncompliance and saliva cortisol estimates.
Methods: We instructed 64 pregnant women to collect eight scheduled saliva samples on two consecutive days each. Objective compliance with scheduled sampling times was assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System and self-reported compliance with a paper-and-pencil diary. In a randomized controlled study, we estimated whether a disclosure intervention (informing women about objective compliance monitoring) and a reminder intervention (use of acoustical reminders) improved compliance. A mixed model analysis was used to estimate associations between women's objective compliance and their diurnal cortisol profiles, and between deviation from scheduled sampling and the cortisol concentration measured in the related sample.
Results: Self-reported compliance with a saliva-sampling protocol was 91%, and objective compliance was 70%. The disclosure intervention was associated with improved objective compliance (informed: 81%, noninformed: 60%), F(1,60)  = 17.64, p<0.001, but not the reminder intervention (reminders: 68%, without reminders: 72%), F(1,60)  = 0.78, p = 0.379. Furthermore, a woman's increased objective compliance was associated with a higher diurnal cortisol profile, F(2,64) = 8.22, p<0.001. Altered cortisol levels were observed in less objective compliant samples, F(1,705) = 7.38, p = 0.007, with delayed sampling associated with lower cortisol levels.
Conclusions: The results suggest that in pregnant women, objective noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and is associated with biased cortisol estimates. To improve sampling compliance, results suggest informing women about objective compliance monitoring but discourage use of acoustical reminders.
UniBasel Contributors:Meinlschmidt, Gunther and Lieb, Roselind and Möller, Julian and Meyer, Andrea Hans
Item Type:Article, refereed
Article Subtype:Research Article
Publisher:Public Library of Science
ISSN:1932-6203
Note:Publication type according to Uni Basel Research Database: Journal article
Language:English
Identification Number:
edoc DOI:
Last Modified:08 Sep 2016 06:23
Deposited On:25 Apr 2014 08:00

Repository Staff Only: item control page